History of the richnesses and their property, through the humanity and in the French history

whole page

 

The principal richness is the knowledge.

Example: I find by chance of gold because a seam leaves ground. When I use this gold, Si I cannot find another seam, I will lose my richness. I must know in which geological situation is the seams if not I will seek randomly and my research will be useless.

There are two sources to know : To look further into the two sources of the knowledge

 

1) the inherent personal source with the human being : without the assistance of whoever, it will forge a human experiment to give a direction to its life and its human condition mortal. This source corresponds to a spiritual advance. It will may find it beneficial to communicate on this subject to share the experiment of the people in which it has confidence or that it will like so that its knowledge compared to the mysteries of the life is rightest, richest and beneficial for him and its entourage.

 

2) the collective source which is produced by the spirit through manual and intellectual work: it is the scientific, technological knowledge. It is used to manage the organization of the tangible properties fruits of work to satisfy the individual needs. 

The management of these sources was not always done in the respect of their complementarity, of an alliance between these two bodies of knowing. Since 320 after J-C., the personal source is prohibited by the Roman church. Today we attend the end of the scientific rationalism which wanted all to explain and reject him also to know it withdrawn of initiation, of the meeting with what our terrestrial existence animates and the indication that this collective knowledge would come from extra terrestrial also throws the disorder among the traditional defenders of this intellectual knowledge.

The conflicts which result from this separation of the two sources and of the will of certain leaders to build their capacity on only one source by condemning those which also use the second, caused the worst crimes and genocides of our history. To control the past to be able to build the future is a task impossible to circumvent. Which here is briefly presented.

There are three forms of property: the management of the richness gotten by the knowledge will be done according to one or the other of these forms.

* the Community property managed by a group, an association, a tribe, people. It is the basic management of the property. Example: in a family, the management of the plates, spoons, forks, knives is done in a Community way. No member of the family will require to have his own cover and to dispute with the others in the contrary case. As long as the organization of the company did not make it possible to follow exactly the registry office of people especially when they changed area, the right of ownership Community and will be exerted by the community or officers of the company. Progress in the communications will make it possible to better manage the identity of people and the right will be able to admit with the legal personality of the prerogatives like that fundamental individually to become owner and to transfer this property from one community to the other. 

* the collective ownership managed by a king, an emperor, a republican state through the administration installation by this capacity. The purpose of this collective ownership is to render a public utility to the citizens and it represents a collective material safety for times of crisis.

* the personal property: it is the asset of the revolution of 1789. It represents the best safety for the citizens because it manages itself its inheritance. Only the state-nation for reasons of law and order can come to remove this right of personal property to him. The development of the industrial era will rest on the right of personal property of the contractors and the situation will develop in discredit of paid which will not be able to make recognize a community of interests within the companies. The republic to defend its right of collective ownership will do everything to prohibit the return of the Community property. Today in front of excesses of the economic liberalism and the universalization of capitalism, the political citizens and their leaders understood that the collective ownership of the state is not any more any help. All understand that to reintroduce a right of ownership Community the end of the liberal or capitalist economic system supposes.

Our system of Western capacity is founded on the prohibition of the first source to know and the richness created starting from the second source is managed so as to prohibit the Community property in order to prevent the return of an organization in network able to remove the system. The consequence is the class struggle but it is not at this stage that it is a question of intervening, it is on the level of the causes: why these interdicts? How to replace this system of being able by a new organization in network based on a total knowledge gathering the two sources of knowing and whose produced richnesses are managed through a mainly Community property?

 

SOURCE OF RICHNESS  HISTORICAL FACTS  RIGHT OF THE PROPERTY

 before - 10 000 years before J-C.

knowledge of people coming from Venus

 the city destroyed of

Tiahuanaco

  Atlantis

Community : the knowledge belongs to the community and is managed by the leaders who control the two sources of knowing. It is transmitted to the close people, in particular the Celts, the Indian people of South America and Centrale. Of course each member or family has a minimal right of personal property but all decides at level Community.

- 10 000 years  at year approximately 0

knowledge of Atlantis transmitted by the survivors of the last great cataclysm in Egypt, Greece

this always intact knowledge in South America and Power station

the knowledge of the Celts, close to Atlantis whose country was saved by cataclysm, this knowledge will cross the Himalayas and will arrive to India.

the gold of Nubie that it is enough to collect by ground and which is distributed on the three continents through the trade of the Egyptians, the gold of Peru and Bolivia for the American continent

the last great cataclysm indicated on the zodiac of Dendérah

the Venus arrival on its current orbit, the descendants of Atlantis start to build the pyramids to leave a trace know to them across cataclysms which strike planet.

civilizations Celt and Egyptian woman, Chinese Indian and, civilization précolombienne, Maya then INCA.

Community within the communities or of the cities organized in networks. The temples manage the reserves of food for the periods of food shortage.

The temples manage initiation and the total knowledge: divine laws and celestial mathematics.

The ways which carry out to the individual extase are taught in the temples.

In Egypt, there is equality between the man and the woman. Slavery does not exist as a right of ownership of a person on another.

320 after J.C. the Council of Nicée

the conquests of the Roman empire which bring in Rome the richnesses of the overcome countries, of which the gold and the corn of Egypt

knowledge contained in the Bible and the Gospels

 The council of Nicée: prohibition of the Christian communities, all must follow the same worked out religion to Rome. Prohibition of the first source to know: the initiatory way, prohibition of the ceremonies of Éleusis

collective: property of the capacity of the emperor and the noble ones. The communities can have a particular statute authorized by the emperor.

after 320, the emperor manages the religious knowledge of the Christian church.

500 after J.C.

Knowledge of the Egyptians, Greeks

the gold which circulates at the end of the Roman empire

royalty: mérovingiens and capétiens

 

Benoit de Nurcie melts the abbey of the Cassin Mount in Italy

 Community property managed by the feudal system: the king and lords. It is the continuation of the system of the Roman capacity arranged according to rules' of the former frank people, goths, etc.

development of the abbeys and a collective ownership managed according to the Community model by the monks who made v?u poverty. This property develops with the detriment of the seigniories and it is more levelling and interdependent

 towards 1 000 after J-C.

 The marriage of the cultures Greek, Hebraic, Moslem, Celt carried out by the monks Benedictines starting from Cluny then Citeaux, Clairvaux

 foundation of the abbey of Cluny which works on the manuscripts coming from the Cassin Mount.

The Norman ones directed by monks Benedictines conquer Sicily and approaches Palestine

Community property : the monastic orders ensure the development of the campaigns and the cities. The communities manage the inheritance, the donations of the private individuals allow them to find refuge, protection and richness within the communities.

from 1000 to 1307  the time of the cathedrals in Europe

 the conquest of Jerusalem at the time of the first crusade makes it possible  to the Benedictines to find manuscripts as what the insurrectionists had hidden under the temple before its destruction. This knowledge supplements those transmitted by Pacôme since Dendérah. The divine laws and celestial mathematics become again more complete.

The knights templiers use maritime knowledge of Norman to trade with A INCA civilization in South America. They introduce the money like currency beside the gold which is done increasingly rare and this money will give them power and the means of financing the carthédrales.

 the conquest of Jerusalem, the foundation of the order of Templiers, the construction of the abbeys and the cathedrals.

power of the order templiers and other orders knights.

King Philippe the Beautiful one almost is ruined and on involved in debt. To save its kingdom, it despoils the Jews of France, with this money it pays mercenaries. It installs a French bishop like pope and installs it in Avignon. Consequently, it can destroy the order of the Temple which directs in fact France. 

In Jerusalem, the European lords betray the will of Templiers to marry the cultures and found the same feudal system as on their premises.

 the communities grow rich: in the campaigns the parishes are organized according to a direct democracy and the cities émancipent royal capacity. In Germany, it is the free urban development recognized by the Emperor.

In 3 centuries, 500 abbeys and 80 cathedrals will be built only on the French ground. This represents a volume of cut stone higher than that worked by the Egyptians during more than 5 000 years. The palate of king de France is not that a residence of second order compared to the constructions financed by Templiers and directed by the monks Benedictines.

from 1307 to 1492

 the plundering of the richnesses piled up at the time of the time of the cathedrals.

Knowledge is choked under the dogmas of the Church of Rome by the Enquiry.

 the plague from Asia by sailors of Venice decimates the population

the one hundred year old war, Jeanne d' Arc.

Christophe Colomb obtains the authorization of the queen of Spain to reopen the road of the trade winds to go to South America and to meet INCA civilization

 collective ownership: the richness is monopolized in France by the royal capacity and the noble ones. The goods of the templiers were confiscated by the king but the majority of the grounds depend on the abbeys and the king cannot seize some. The clergy thus will continue to manage this important land inheritance made up at the time of time of the cathedrals. The king will not be rich and of the lords and chiefs of war will be able to become richer than him like the counts of Burgundy, Lorraine or Provence.

.

1494 to 1789

 gold and the money, the invaluable stones arrive in abundance to Europe following the plundering of INCA civilization and Aztec but the pope reserved this colonization that in Spain and Portugal.

the pope asks that gold and the money be molten before being embarked for Europe in order to make disappear the evidence of the clear superiority from civilization of the New World on that of Europe. The Bible and the dogmas of papacy cannot be contradicted by the knowledge of this INCA civilization if not the capacity in Europe is discredited and must be changed.

 1494, by the treaty of Tordesillas, the pope prohibited in other countries that Spain and Portugal of going to Central America and South.

At the time of the controversy of Valladolid, the church decides that the Indians of America do not have a heart, also the conquistadores can exterminate them, this in order to protect the knowledge defended by papacy in Occident. This genocide will rise to approximately 70 million Indians killed over several centuries, mainly in the mines or at the time of epidemics started by the colonists

In France, after the wars against Spain, time from the wars of religion against the Protestants  Dont the fleet of the flibustiers will come brings gold and the richnesses plundered to them to the Spaniards.

The reign of Louis XIV is completed in misery: the Protestants do not insert of gold in the country and the war against Spanish come to Holland to drive out the Dutch flibustiers and the French Protestant flibustiers who had found refuge there, will ruin royal finances.

The foundation of the United States of America make it possible to the European opponents of the royal and religious system to set up another model of democratic company by restoring the place of the communities and their liberty of action without any dependence at a religious capacity.

conflicts of property between Community and collective.  The states which bring back the gold of South America become very rich and Spain represents the first power in Europe.

France is prohibited by the pope to go to America. But the Norman sailors will refuse to obey the pope and will organize the flibuste to plunder the Spanish galleons and Portuguese which bring back the richnesses plundered to the INCA empire and Aztec. Their home ports will grow rich like Dieppe, Le Havre, Honfleur, Saint-Malo, etc.

The king of France will have only the richness of his grounds and of the taxes, it will not have a royal fleet to bring back gold of a colony and it will have to become exhausted in the regular fights against Spain to save its throne.

 In France, the richness belongs to those which use the knowledge of the time of the time of the cathedrals and refuse the plundering of the New World authorized by the pope. The Protestants become richer than the king as the templiers had been to it time of Philippe the Beautiful one. The catholics defend their capacity by exterminating the Protestants then by driving out them of the kingdom. Consequently the French catholic leaders condemn the country to remain with the variation of the major evolutions of the European company. The Protestants will invest their richness in industry and France will take a consequent delay in the development of this new source of richness.

 from 1789 to our days

 the richness comes from the development of the industrial era, of the accumulation of knowledge, the mass production and the international trade.

The system of being able gives up any reference to the authority of the popes on the political leaders.

Sciences do not have to be justified any more compared to the dogmas of the Church. Western civilization puts at the shelter wars of religion by maintaining taboo any use of the personal source of knowing and any recourse to the initiating way. It will develop the scientific rationalism whose unacceptable limits will burst vis-a-vis with the industrial catastrophes and the terrorist acts that the leaders of this system will not have been able to imagine, it because of the narrowness and smallness of this scientific spirit which refuses the essential development of a total knowledge starting from the two sources of knowing.

The French Republic will not follow the model of the American Constitution. The revolution of 1789 must answer pressing requirements.

The Declaration of the rights of man and of the citizen of 1789 organizes the company on two levels: the personal property recognized for all citizens and the collective ownership managed by the nation through the representatives of the people. The nation is one and indivisible. The operations of the popes do not have any more any effect on the nation and Rome cannot divide the French people any more according to his religion or its tender or not with the dogmas of the Church

In 1791, the law the Hatter prohibits the corporations and in a total way any community which would like to have an organization different from that of the nation. The Republic makes the vacuum between it and the citizens. Little by little, the republic will have to fill this vacuum to recognize the essential need for a collective expression: trade union, association, work's council, local union in the company. This evolution especially took place in the law the labour. The unfinished decentralization of the capacity does not recognize the rights of the communities of life.

Today, certain cultural groups to fight against the republican system which does not recognize their right at a community of life, organized resistance networks with which some is armed.

Introduction of the personal property.  Consequently the industrial leaders can use their right of personal property in their companies to confiscate with their profit the profits of productivity. The revolutions of the XIXème century will not manage any more to modify this situation founded in 1789.

 the revolt of the silk workers will be completed by their massacre by the royal army.

After the social laws of 1864 and 1884 respectively on the right to strike and trade-union freedom, the law of 1901 on associations will try to fill this vacuum between the citizens and the nation but these associations will never have the educational and social role nor the economic role of a community. France will remain divided between a minority of leaders organized into elite and the remainder of the people.

They are the 250 families which direct the economy of the country, whereas on the level of the nation reigns the opposition to progress of the republican institutions folded up on the defense of their official monopolies with an aim of managing and of developing the public property, the collective ownership of the citizens.

A community cannot develop its own source of richness under pretext which it would come to condemn the current system. A service of local exchange (S.E.L.) cannot organize and to develop barter and solidarity within its community because that brings an unfair competition with the personal property of the craftsmen and heads of undertaking which the nation must defend bus if not it is not used any more for nothing.

 

With through this reading of the history of the right of ownership and the richnesses, we can also highlight the close link between form of the property (individual, Community, collective) and development of transport and the communications.

In antiquity, when the distances, the geographical obstacles could not be crossed quickly with the means of transport of the time, the organization in network was appropriate bus put aside the threat of by far come invaders, a relative safety existed. See the example of the natives of the Tobriands islands (paid by Malinowski) which until the beginning of the XXème century lived insulated and could keep their organization matriarcale in networks of tribes. As soon as it was possible to move many armies quickly, the companies organized in network were overcome by those organized in system of being able centralized and autocratic, mainly by the Roman empire organized on the military capacity whose human and political values were contrary with those of the companies in networks. To counter this threat represented by a neighbor organized in system of being able dedicated with the conquest of the richnesses on the others, each people were to also constitute themselves in system of being able and to develop best the armed possible one. The most completed organization was then that of an empire gathering several people in the same system of being able. The threat of war was permanent because the vocation of a system of being able organized on the military capacity is indeed to conquer the richnesses with the detriment of the others to develop. The organization in network set up by the Benedictines and the orders knights, the order of Temple, in spite of the flourishing development of the time of the cathedrals, did not resist either this hegemonic will to constitute powerful systems of being able centralized, pledge of considerable enrichment for the civil and religious minorities with the capacity.

Today, the fresh progress in communication, telecommunications modify the terms of the insecurity and the threat. All is known and the criminals or despots can also use new technologies, the richness which the level of knowing constitutes technological current. In front of the inefficiency of the systems of being able to regulate the dysfunctions of our companies, the alternative of the organization in network finds its place. Better technologies of information and communication make a improvement of knowledge, confidence or a rejection of an organization which does not appear reliable any more. Thus we start to measure all the width of the damage caused with our environment by the industrial company. Precisely, this improvement of the confidence of the citizens in their organizations is the heart, the base of the organization in network. On this site, we show how through the first interpersonal contract then the Community contract, this degree of confidence can be restored to minimize violence and to develop the authority exerted by each member of a community. Internet can and must also contribute to this development, this evolution.

 

  2 sources of the knowledge    collective knowledge   : its prohibited origin and taboo

the systems  

english translations       home            library