Policies which rest on bets
The elections of 2007 prepare in an election campaign whose principal axis is summarized in the words “rupture” or “major change”. Our politicians and the militants of their parties included/understood the rupture, the ditch which has been established for several decades between the citizens and their representatives. The current countryside relates little to the causes of this rupture : by decency, our politicians present few analyzes on the failures, compromisings, the corruptions and the loss of our republican Utopias, the incapacity to make function the French republican pact. They prefer speech or are obliged to present viable and acceptable solutions. To criticize the policies followed by the outgoing government, this facility used usually in the past, is not any more setting: the citizens have some enough of these processes which do not lead to nothing since almost all the last governments pursued the same impotent policy vis-a-vis the changes of the economy and to the development of the inequalities organized by the new millionaires and billionaires and other new rich person to political cynicism, economic and social of the worst species. This change of tone in the countryside is reinforced by the arrival of a new generation of politicians to the supreme candidature. The presence of at least a candidate who has real chances to be elected President, still accentuates this revival in the political community and takes part concretely in this perception that we let us live a rupture or a major change in our political practices. However the heart of the combat did not change, on the contrary the electoral combat became even wilder and petty. Never a political party had had as much the hand put on the media to weigh on the public opinion. We the Italian example in this field, is this had our turn of living these horrors citizens and is this the announced change there? To hide these obscure and scandalous realities, a real aubaine was encrusted in the marketing year 2007: the irruption in force of the truths ecologists, the impossible to circumvent question of the reheating of planet and the solution of the durable development that this climatic disordered state imposes. All the parties included/understood the interest of this electoral topic which starts to arrange everyone: to focus the parties and the voters on the future to try to make quickly forgotten the political past and its failures, gone up inequalities, forgotten company and advantageous economy, this endemic unemployment which almost does not drop especially that the reform on the retirements moved back three years the departure of the first age brackets of the baby-boom which will start only in 2009. In the same way, temptation is real and large to use these shown ecological truths each day a little more by the advances in knowledge of the ground and the universe, to attenuate the impact of the development of the fanatic religious capacities in the poor countries and among the poor of our Western companies, mainly among the population of recent foreign origin. This topic ecologist also lends itself to a rupture, with a major change in the politicking argumentations: it is as if the charts were redistributed, that there was a news always gives, that the incompetents of yesterday could remake assets to remain in the part and to think to again be able to gain it, to the same table, in the same place! There, there is no trace of rupture nor of major change, there are new and formidable bet: to continue to want to direct our systems of certainly being able by giving a new course but while finally managing to take the places in the palates of the republic that the outgoing generation kept so a long time in its capacity. To manage once more to persuade the citizens whom they must initially vote for our bus candidature, we must be able at the supreme capacity before any possibility of rupture or major change compared to the policies of the past. The citizens must go to the ballot boxes at the end of an electoral combat increasingly more pitiless or of an electoral joke increasingly more ridiculous and nauseating even if they do not support any more this set of the easily deceived ones, because after, the victorious political party will set up this rupture or this change. This first bet in the chronological order of the things is not the last by far. We did sufficient competitions in the bicycle and ski touring and to climb at the top of the mountains, some times at more than four thousand meters in the Alps to know what is the mutual aid and competitive spirit. We consider that the political action is not a competition to know which camp will gain the right to settle with the capacity, that the fight for the conquest of the capacity has nothing to do with the exercise of the authority and the minimization of violences. In an organization in network, the fight to conquer a capacity does not exist and that which exerts the power usually made wish of poverty and humility and practical the active listening of the group of which it with the load.
The diversity of the political programs is at the beginning a richness for a country, still is necessary it that a complementarity and an association of the means and wills are set up to carry out the majority of these measurements. This largely exceeds the only conquest of the capacity to be able to follow its own policy which the verdict of the ballot boxes will have metamorphosed in best policies to set up.
Bets developed in this election campaign of 2007:
We traverse the political space from one extreme to another while starting with the line.
On the extreme line:
the bet consists in hiding its traditional face, to place on the front of the scene the personality of a younger generation but which works for the father founder: the rupture of the generations is here only very partial and with final, non-existent. The strategy of influence of the voters is in rupture on the form but not on the bottom: there is no more use of the register of emotions (the fatherland, the concept, the French identity, etc) but there is use of the two other strategies: the call to the feeling of membership of the French group and mainly there is use of the logical argumentation: the traditional parties will not change their politicking manners, the inequalities are closely related to laxisms of the policies on immigration; vis-a-vis the financial drifts of the universalization of the economy, a return to protectionist measurements is essential to avoid the plundering of our companies by the funds of investments and the foreign funds of pension. It is enough to buy know-how, the French mark and its notoriety then it is a question of closing the factories and the offices in France to produce at lower cost elsewhere and to confiscate for oneself the maximization of the profits thus carried out. This judgment of the ultra liberalism is accompanied of course and like always, of a rejection visceral of the communist solution. Put this thesis main road-Socialist which openly any more does not dare to bear its name but preserves in secrecy all the power of the arguments which brought Germany and part of Europe collaborationnist to enter in war in 1939 against the capitalist countries and the communist countries to try to impose to the order new Nazi, remainder always present in the political debate and each crisis pokes new adhesions with these sectarian beliefs, nationalists who lead ineluctably to the war. Because in these theses, there is no place for a compromising with other systems of being able and even less the place for a co-operation with organizations in network which are the perfect opposite example compared to this political dictatorship. Then in 2007, these parties inevitably collect new adhesions since there is crisis. Can one bet that that will be enough to gain the electoral combat? The only certainty is known: if the votes of these militants of extreme right-hand side and the votes protesters of the citizens who want to cause the defeat of the democratic parties to be avenged for their policies of the past, if these two votes elect the extreme line, then the hour of the revolution by the civil insurrection meets to make sounds. In fact the horrors of the street will certainly make move back several generations the conditions to leave our systems capacity civil and religious and to set up the organizations in network based on the direct participative democracy and the complementarity between the three forms of property.
On the right: there are several bets,
the bet of new generations of politicians very ambitious and which does not arrive any more at hiding its impatience to take the place of the preceding generation. Was it formed at a good republican school? It becomes obvious that it was especially formed in the art and lownesses of the control of the more or less occult networks which make function the apparatus of state. This politicking competence is dangerous and contrary with a majority of citizens who wish a development of the life participative citizen and the elimination of the politico-financial scandals and real estate which precisely already contaminates considerable these politicians of right-hand side even if justice cannot or with the order not to collect the evidence of these dishonesties.
The bet of pure and hard liberalism: presents itself on two axes:
o Increase in the public expenditure through all kinds of electoral promises. This small play the current candidate beats with punt seams the outgoing President who had not dared to go until there at the time of the last election of 2002 bus there is all the same the throbbing situation of the national debt which is well the result of the last governmental policies. Very studying in management and economy knows the cycles of growth. Here is that this party serves again us this intellectual salad: put aside the certainty that one day indeed there will be again a strong growth and that it will be the moment to sponge the national debts, these political decision makers do not dare to look opposite the put policies does not place by the industrial and financial officers of the company: the growth is elsewhere, in other continents. To develop conditions to support the growth in Europe does not interest them any more: our countries must consume what is produced elsewhere, a point all. Can one finance the growth on the only tool of distribution whereas usually it is the production equipment which creates the added value and thus the GDP? The commercial margins nourish the new rich person when there is not the price war and that to maintain an advantage competing, the companies use strategies of innovation in the place of the strategies of domination by the costs, if not the commercial margins are crushed by the producers who do not support that their distributers install such barriers to consumption on their markets. Very studying in management, to obtain its diploma will say it to you. Is France champion in the innovation? The dilapidation of its structures of research and the escape of the researchers bring a shingling denial.
This escape in front of the public expenditure in addition to their extremely dangerous character raises an essential question however: aren't the leaders of this party openly or a discrete way, making the bet of the advent of the Anglo-Saxon financial oligarchy of which we showed that the culture rests on the values Malthusians and of which the goal consists in undermining the capacity of the states and with dérèglementer the national economic policies to leave the field free to their theses preserving monetarists and ultra intended to maximize the protection of the rich person and to draw aside the threat of the rising of the poor throughout the world? If the candidates of this party want to postulate in a place of choice in this world financial oligarchy, there is not that flattering meetings with the Bush clan in the United States, it is necessary indeed to gain the capacity in France to effectively serve these new Masters of the world who did not lose yet their capacity economic and financial and were not thrown yet in prison in the USA or here in Europe, Switzerland and tax havens including. (what will belong to nearest attributions of a Minister of Interior Department, in particular in France).
o The dismantling of the social right and the republican pact. It is indeed here about a frightening rupture in the rules of the Republic. The right is made certainly to evolve/move with the proviso of initially modifying the causes which brought this state of the right. This party does not militate to set up an organization in network, which would largely explain this abandonment of the current right for the benefit of a more protective right still of the citizens. Not, this party militates well to transform our system of being able for the benefit of the leading classes.: The idea is simplistic even if it is logical: the more the heads of undertaking will make benefit, the more there should be employment and the more the taxes should return in the cases of the state. The capitalist and liberal system does not give results that within the framework of the maximization of the profits. Without these profits, nothing really goes and in the last they are the employees who make the expenses of them, the state in front of then helping them by digging its public deficits in particular. In short that transfers quickly with the republican nightmare. It is well a logical intellectual construction but there is nothing here to slow down the imagination of a poet and to view other constructions quite as logical and certainly more justifying for the citizens. We showed the error of 1789 which gave the priority to the personal property and interdict the common property. As long as this error will not be eliminated in France and in the countries subjected to the capitalist economic system, the opposition between right of personal property of the means of production and distribution of the richnesses and social right, mainly law the labor will remain vain and be a barrier to the durable development in humanity. The solution which consists in making to each employee a shareholder is particularly hypocritical and indecent in France: since 1945, no government concretized the objective in this field of the national council of resistance of Algiers and did not found the voting rights of the employee representatives to the commercial board of directors of the company. The Marshall plan imposed in Germany and the participative management of the German companies in particular must inspire any candidate before it does not tell silly things. Without that we inevitably return to this will to put out of order our national economies to support the development of Anglo-Saxon financial oligarchy who certainly could make a small place with the French leaders of the greatest financial groups if they managed to make apply such social anti policies on our premises, wonder not at all obvious even for a powerful economic decision maker of Manhattan or City in London. But it is a bet which can bring back its weight of dollars… if the French employees behave as in the experiment of Milgram, precisely developed to Yale, other side Hudson River….but it should not be forgotten that all these territories before colonization, belonged to the Confederation iroquoise of the great law which binds of the people which builds, confederation of people organized in networks and its imported roots of France and ever lost, will give again early or late life with new trees of prosperity for all the members of their political, economic and social organization.
On the shape of the election campaign: the bet is that the control of the media in the sale of the candidate according to laws' of the most commercial marketing, will give the decisive asset to gain the electoral combat. While spending its time attacking each day the adversary more than to expose its proposals and to convince the voter, the bet for populist that it is, is not inevitably gained and it can be even turned over against this party. All depends if the electorate is really idiotic as this party takes it and than the behaviors of the citizens in their majority follow what occurs in the experiment from Milgram, i.e. that they are subjected to these clear and clear instructions to give blows to the adversary. In the contrary case, the citizens who followed some instructions and obtained some same diplomas not recognized on the wage level in their company or their administration, can find very well these operations perfectly hateful and worthy of more beautiful applicant to the dictatorship.
On the left: there are also no badly bets.
on the shape of the countryside : there is the first bet of the participation of the militants in the proposals of the candidate. The use of the form of ascending communication in the internal communication of the socialist party can lend to smiling when one is in contexts organized by leading elites which do not state that one downward manner and still, just what it is necessary because advisers taught them that in the absence of communication, they were exposed to being abused by rumors devastators. This bet for the socialist party coherent with the will is posted to make progress the participative democracy, we will return there. The second bet on the shape of the countryside is more delicate and concerns each candidate for each election: what is really necessary to say during the program? It is necessary to allure the voter and especially not to frighten it or plunge it in an annoying doubt. To take is the risk to be teaching paying whereas others misuse demagogic processes? Let us take the example of the participative democracy: the Net surfers attending our Web site know that the basic rule able to make it function and the principle of subsidiarity. We explained the place of this principle among the bases of the organization in network and we had wished to see it entering our French regulation at the time of the referendum on the European constitution, which it was a question at the time of this referendum of seeing it restoring on the ground which had seen it to open out at the time of the time of the cathedrals under the protection and the direction of the orders knights, mainly about the knights templiers whose seat was well in France. Is this to lose voters only the candidate does not dare to resort to a logical argumentation and to explain why to set up a semi-direct or direct participative democracy is not complicated and that we know all the tools to conclude the successfully such a company? Once elected, will it put this direct democracy places from there while using this principle of subsidiarity? Does it think of innovating and of discovering another manner of making? It that the unit of the party is a priority to gain and to make conceal the unmatched voices but the change is comprehensible doesn't start by breaking of old taboos which are well-worn?
on the form and the bottom: which place granted to the values founders of socialism? To defend which values with the Juste? The personalities which have work for the reinforcement of the socialist state, for a capacity centralized which with these laws was going to impose socialism, a little with the manner of the communist and Soviet capacities? The quarrels which divided the left are known: between those and those which based socialism on even utopian ideas and those and those which privileged the class struggle and the orientation Marxist of the movement. The right-wing candidate as very student of Sciences Po can with leisure seek to revive these old quarrels to divide the unfavourable camp, that does not make more laugh nobody so much this receipt is well-worn. Can one always leave with the oubliettes the founder of the word socialism, of course French as it should be, Pierre Leroux and his technique of the capitalization of the social rights. This technique was refused by the French Parliament for the workmen and was transposed to the profit of the shareholders of the limited liability companies and of SA about 1860 and this success for the shareholders lasts since. Why continue to put a stringcourse on the eyes whereas the socialist party is historically holder of the technical solution which we need to regulate our current social problems, in particular the question of the retirements without resorting to the Anglo-Saxon technique of the funds of pension, by developing in the noncommercial economy a capitalization of the rights acquired in the commercial and noncommercial economy throughout its life?
On the bottom, there is first of all this innovative program on the participative democracy but the bet consists to evoke it without describing operation of it and quoting measurements able to found it. Admittedly the adversaries can gausser in front of this alleged absence of program: that they are reassured: we know exactly how to develop a participative democracy even if we would prefer by far to develop it within the framework of an organization in network. But to make evolve a system of being able since a centralized capacity inherited the absolute monarchy to a semi-direct democracy remaining in a system to be able, does not have anything improbable and of mysterious, it is according to us simply damage to stop in so good way. And should not especially here be used the fatal argument that the others could not follow or would be unable to include/understand the new orientation given to the political action. We soon will publish several articles on the education system set up in our industrialized companies, it is clear that the fight against ignorance since 1789 was only very partial and very selective within the framework of the protection of our system of élitiste and centralized capacity and that the school of the private property is very bad formative in this field. It is a really shame not to put in the middle of this participative democracy the principle of subsidiarity under pretext of of not wanting to reopen the argument which took place at the time of the referendum on the European constitution and which, in our opinion, rested on other questions.
Another bet is related to the fate reserved for the state: the rupture is quite real when it is a question of giving up the centralism of the capacity to develop a democracy local and participative but the return of a parliamentary system and the rejection of a presidential mode are enough to change the structure of the state radically? We are far from leaving a system of being able and very near to choking with the cradle the development of a local democracy. The jurys citizens are closer to Soviets put at the style of the day than of the groups of resolution of existing problems within the framework of the principle of subsidiarity, however it is towards the operation of subsidiarity that these jurys citizens must tend.
There is also the bet to speak very little about the development of the noncommercial economy and the possibilities of solidarity which it allows. Indeed if one remains with the role of the state keynésien, it is the state and the socialist capacity which will direct national solidarity without restoring the common property. We have just buried the abbot Pierre, he would be perhaps time on a purely posthumous basis to recognize its essential merit to him: in France of the post-war period, whereas the state and the politicians activated themselves to rebuild the infrastructures of the country, the finance public were used more to finance equipment intended for the companies and fortunate people that to people in the need, mainly in the real estate where there was no money to finance social housing. The Pierre abbot took the initiative to assemble an organization in network: the communities of Emmaüs and inevitably, since it was able to face prohibitions or the obstacles of the leaders of the systems of civil and religious capacity, this organization in network could only succeed because its success does not depend on resources collected by the financial institutions but it depends only on the work of its members without forgetting the charitable assistance of the company. This mechanism is largely used in the organization in network and we could say today that a new Pierre abbot could not succeed any more because it is likely to fall under prohibition from SALT pronounced in 1997. The guild chamber of the companies of sorting of waste could make prohibit its activity taking into consideration this shameless jurisprudence… and we are far unfortunately from a simple argument of ragmen! We know that this question of the development of the noncommercial economy is especially raised by the movements alter mondialists and that here once more we enter the old quarrels of the left which never manages to remake its unit but which also explains why by not making the effort surmount them, it meets so many political failures.
In the social field, there is also bet the 35 hours. We were explained a few years ago on our site. In 1998-2000, during this short period of strong growth put at evil by the explosion of the Asian speculative bubble then of bubble Internet, in the absence of a better redistribution of the value added in favor of the employees, it agreed judicious time to the place of the money, knowing that this measurement was to be financed by obtaining profits of productivity of approximately 10%. A student in management or economy will recite you the four sources of profits of productivity: obtaining economies of scale, the use of a new technology, the rise in competences, the installation of a more efficient structure offering more synergies. The relatively low level of our investments for more than twenty years, the precarisation of employment which goes against the rise in competences, the chronic incapacity of our two million very small companies to durably create job without assistances of the authorities has largely justified an intervention of the state to stimulate the economic agents: to impose the 35 hours on the companies of less than 20 paid will oblige them to use the single source of profits of productivity quickly accessible: economies of scale. To be able to produce more with the same resources, the pragmatic possibility consists so that these small contractors join in larger structures offering a size to them criticizes better, of synergies and the economies of scale by the pooling or the externalisation of certain means. In theory it is easy to say, actually it is once more a question of breaking a taboo going back to 1789 and of reducing the priority granted to the personal property; in particular means of production. We took part in the reorganization of an automobile equipment supplier and we still have with the spirit the confidences of several frameworks of the SOGEDAC which was then the central merchandizing of group PSA. They exposed us their enormous difficulties to convince of the heads of undertaking of small factories to be invested and to join in companies of European size. In front of the refusal to give up or share their capacity of direction, they were obliged to stripe these small factories of the list of the suppliers of the automobile group, thus condemning thousands of employment through the country mainly in rural zone to turn primarily to the German equipment suppliers initially before then imitating the Volkswagen group which had already subsidiary companies or under treating with Portugal or in the Eastern European countries. This question does nothing but worsen as the company is small but there are an advisability to position back the common property and a management based on the principle of subsidiarity as well as a management of the employees based on the capitalization of the rights defined by Pierre Leroux. The only question is due to the will or not to do it. It is a real change of political, economic and social paradigm, much more than one simple rupture or than a major change. We are able to undertake this change, the means of pressure for the opponents is simple: removal of the state aid to the small private company and the transfer of part of these funds to the new companies organized in local area networks of innovation and competences. What will slow down considerably the digging of the national debts and will stop Net the enrichment of certain small contractors who refuse to evolve/move to maintain the privileges of their right of personal property. The taxes of paid are not versed to finance this kind of assistances to the private company. This has a direct consequence in law the labor: the end of the precarious contracts and the end of the discussions on the right of the dismissal since the local area network of the companies mutualise employment between the adherent companies with the network, it is also a massive reduction of unemployment and RMI because the mutualisation of employment include/understand commercial and noncommercial employment which has the same level of wages but which is remunerated not only and exclusively in official currency. This practice exists moving France and well in the commercial economy even if it remains insulated for lack of political good-will to generalize it. The 35 hours are not whereas a stage towards a fall of the duration of the work in the commercial economy to allow the development of work in the noncommercial economy and the opening of a quaternary economy or a third sector beside deprived and of the public. About 1930, Keynes indicated that in the year 2000, it would be enough within sight of technical progress to work only 20 hours per week so that a household provides for its priority needs, knowing that the people would work also approximately 20 hours in the noncommercial economy to acquire social rights intended to get leisures, holidays, assistances to be formed or assistances with the person depending on their old age and health. The reduction of the working time is comprehensible only in this context of the development of the noncommercial economy. The absence of investments of the owners of the means of production which delay the acquisition of new technologies, their absence of will to share their capacity to accelerate obtaining a size criticizes generating economies of scale and of safety vis-a-vis competition, these lacks of political responsibility in control for the economy do not have to come any more to prevent the reduction of the working time in the commercial economy, knowing that the value added by the commercial economy is not in any case sufficient any more to finance the welfare expenditures related on the retirements and the expenditure of health related to the ageing of the population, without counting the financing of the rebuilding of the country after the climatic catastrophes which make increasingly frequent, mini the tornadoes in Texane which start to devastate our villages.
In the field of solidarity, there is perhaps here a guilty absence bet or then this bet is very limited, probably with the only installation of a civil national service for all the young boys and girls. Other measurements on the raising of the SMIC and the social assistances or the retirements belong to great classic kind but do not mark rupture or of major change in the operation of our system of economic capacity. This citizen availability for actions of solidarity will find fields of intervention very useful: the real estate and social housing in the direct prolongation of the already existing organizations in network as that rested by the Pierre abbot but which are far from being sufficient. There are the activities in renewable energies and a better use of our forests. It is necessary to also mention the sports activities related on the health and the prevention of the evils of our “modern” companies: obesity, evils of belly caused per too much sedentariness at the working station then to the living room in front of television, the computer, the video game console, etc We dare to add the practice of a spiritual step and especially the practice of relations in love, the regular exercise of the sexual intercourse within the framework of the released love of the constraints moralisatrices founded by the systems of religious capacity. These measurements must eliminate the social conflicts and interpersonal, the explosion of the divorces, marital violences caused by marriages or dubious relations, the emotional lack caused by these situations in the children, etc Vis-a-vis these needs, this non-military national service remains a quite ridiculous beginning. We showed on our Web site that only the organizations in networks are able to develop these bonds of solidarity. They made a success of it in the past, they of it are always able today since one gives up the priority granted everywhere to the personal property.
in the field of the equality : measurements relate to the access to education, the school chart and the handing-over in the school system of the young people in the process of delinquency. There are also justice and the tax equality. Justice rests on the principle of legality: all the citizens are subjected to the law, it does not have privileges there. Justice also functions thanks to the principle of equity: each case is taken into account with humanity and respect of dignity human being. Tax measurements in an electoral program are used to finance the proposals for a new public expenditure. For a right-wing candidate, which occupies more commercial economy and prohibits in theory the development of the noncommercial economy, all the financing of its program passes by tax measurements, transfers of budgets, etc On the left, the social measures generally weigh even heavier in the budget of the country than measurements of the right-wing candidate. Both can logically use the theory keynésienne on the role of the state and to count on a resumption of the growth to make up the public deficits except that, as in 1998-2000, the financial speculators and markets which even more quickly create speculative bubbles in period of strong growth, by making it certainly involuntarily burst, shorten this period of growth considerably, leaving the political community in the most complete sinistrose and the public deficits at the same point as before the financial crisis unless the budget of the state serf to fill the debts of certain financial organizations to avoid the collapse of all the system and the ruin of the savers, creating a new crash as in 1929. We know that to leave the Asian crisis of 1997, they were the American taxpayers and the budget of the Treasury who reinflated the case of the LTCM, this hedge funds which had taken ill-considered risks on the speculative markets and which threatened of bankruptcy at least six large French banks to speak only about our country. Miser over the future period of growth becomes a very dangerous bet which should be interdict in the finance public. On the other hand, the left can differently finance most of the social measures since it develops the noncommercial economy and sets up a capitalization of the social rights expressed either in convertible official currency or not out of gold or dollar but in currency symbolic system as in a SALT. As each time, this financial mechanism will not be able to function that within the framework of a high degree of confidence among the economic agents and mainly the households, the citizens. We showed that this development of a high degree of confidence which does not exist today is closely related to the spiritual development, with the use of the first individual source of knowing. The line can scoff the enormous costs at the social measures of the left, it is traditional kind but when the left will finally mark in the field of the taxation a clear rupture with the past, to operate a true change of political, economic and tax paradigm? Marketing sells well happiness, a few years ago it was simply wind, today it sells evidence of specific and momentary happiness, moments of happiness which cost in general extremely expensive but that the customers buy free to deprive most of the year. The search of the happiness and the satisfaction of our reasons of living, exists. There is even the development of index of happiness and a classification of the countries where there is the most happiness: the Vanuatu arrives in first and the USA are 150ème, France is perhaps a little in front of the USA but we must probably also move back in this classification. Happiness does not have a price and does not buy itself with money, it divides itself simply when we found it. For the poet and the initiate, happiness corresponds to one precise moment of its step: the moment of Samadhi, the illumination, the meeting with that which lives in us and us makes cross the death of the carnal body, happiness to reappear with the life under our human condition, happiness continues in the phase of evolution which follows upon the illumination. I began very early a dialog with my heart, the spirits and a poetic and spiritual activity; in class of sixth, as I tried to express my lived of conspicuous poet, the professors called me “the happy imbecile”. They had at least understood that I was happy even if they could not include/understand from which this source came from the happiness which I had collected in me. My comrades called me” ordering it " and indeed I made a point of ordering the class to require professors another teaching in particular including the initiatory source. That the Vanuatu is first does not astonish us. We showed the culture first of Oceania through the study of Malinowski on the natives of the Trobriands islands, their use of sexuality at ends in love and also to channel violences and to eliminate them during orgiaques festivals or of rites. Our company collapses under welfare expenditures and the most stripped assistances with which should not exist any more since glosses if the states were not headings to want with administrations increasingly more to have the monopoly of the social action instead of opening the noncommercial economy and to help the development of the organizations in network able to build houses, cities, to produce our foods, to train companions in the control of works also serving the future generations, etc. It Malayan of civilization added to the reheating of planet have what to transform each citizen of the future generations into tax slave of father out of wire or a girl! And only to preserve the place of the state in the social organization whereas we know that some of our ancestors lived happier than us without state! The political community, if she likes the political action, can change she radically all the same also her politicking attitudes. Here also, there must be rupture! We also we like the political action but within the framework of a direct participative democracy organized in networks. It is the same situation for the retirements, the dependence of the fourth age. Which political party will leave us this monopoly of the financing of the state reserved for the commercial economy? We know that the development of the noncommercial economy ruins the leaders of the commercial economy quickly just like the organization in network directed by Templiers ruined the king of France and made useless the presence of a pope to Rome. It is a question today of educating the citizens so that they refuse to join and obey the ruined leaders of the commercial economy and the systems of civil and religious capacities so that no more Friday ago 13 to see destroyed the new organizations in network which are differently financed than in royal currency, dollar or euro while using banking operations or of bancassurance with their instrument of exchange symbolic system or their capitalization of the social rights which inevitably exchangeable or is managed within the framework of the property common at the local level… thanks to computers, Internet and all that it is necessary, including experts in these perfectly just exchanges and who made wish of poverty.
We dare to make the bet which the left will not create this rupture and this change of culture and which once more it will make the round back under the attacks of the right-hand side on the level of its tax measurements and of the cost of its social measures… and that it will bite the fingers. But will do we it and it is not an oath of mother but of French poet, child of Hugo, Musset, Mallarmé, Baudelaire, Rimbaud and Verlaine, of Aragon, of Eluard, Breton and so much of other men and women but not too child of Lamartine bus in 1848, it made not badly silly things whereas it held the revolutionary capacity. We were with another poetic school, more intuitive, less poetry of living room and puns, of rhymes.
These bets or these not-bets are well in the social tradition of the French left, still is necessary it to have political courage to undertake these civilizing measurements serving the durable development. Statement then to prove it by achievements. To dare to undertake the major change, the velvet revolution which French never made a success of (it is true that the Russian people forever successful to make a first true revolution to release itself from the tyrants but it is not a report comforting for us).
On the extreme left:
there is initially the bet undertaken by the Communist Party to remain faithful to the values of last and which is not able to be called into question, i.e. to give up the priority granted to the collective ownership to dare to restore the common property and to grant a place to the local democracy, putting thus fine at the myth dictatorship of the party and the centralism of the state. In short, while admitting finally that Marx and Engels made a heavy error while wanting to use the apparatus of the state to found Communism and by rejecting the example of the organization in network which they had under their eyes and which they however admired by studying the Confederation of the nations iroquoises which was used as source with the constitution of the United States of America.
The movement alter mondialist, in our opinion, still did not pose the terms of its bet: to fight against is the liberal ultra system enough to justify its existence? We bet that not! There is the obvious influence of the trade-union mediums: the French trade unionism never truly recovered from the law scélérate Waldeck Rousseau of 1884 which shared political space between the political parties and the trade unions, condemning the latter to the only professional claim of order without daring to intervene on the political level: the political parties dominating left the always prompt working medium there to go down in the street or to carry out riots which do not lead to nothing and do not have any force of proposal. The politician belongs well to the leading elite of the country and the even syndicalized workman must start with him to obey. This way of life of the 19th century to justify that it could be it yesterday, and still we will not justify it, is not any more current but there remains present and largely explains the disaffection of the trade unions by the employees. We had explained it as of the years 1997 in the few meetings in which we had taken part : the movement alter mondialist holds a speech which is concretized in organizations in network. To develop the alternative of the organization in network, presents is too precursory a risk to be misunderstood, to be rejected by the political community ? To make is the bet remain on the values of secularity and scientific rationalism, the clerical anti culture and be unaware of the spiritual development which ensures the development of the relations of confidence and solidarity, federator and carrying success ? We make the bet that not !
In the center
the center political party makes the bet of the honest and sincere word. It is him which recognize more the failures and compromisings of the political community which brought the social fracture and the divorce between the citizens and their elected officials. It disputes the choices of the liberal ultra economy openly
it makes the bet of the values of the Christian democracy: uprightness and social solidarity
its bet, in our opinion, has the disadvantage of remaining surface and not easily comprehensible as long as it does not go up at the time where the Christian values led to success an organization in network and brought the marriage of the cultures in Europe. To use the Christian or quite simply spiritual statutory values since they are not particular with the catholic system of capacity which besides fought them and eliminated (they are specific to all the cultures bus in a social group, people inevitably carry out more or less collectively organized spiritual steps or prohibited by the fanaticized religious capacities), to use these values without going back at the time of the cathedrals, this organization in networks of companions and knights, abbeys and cities free, without explaining why these values are bequeathed to us since the temples of Egypt and in particular since the temple of Dendérah, represents a bet in our dangerous opinion bus to give only one left the explanation without daring to give the real source of it, makes the position awkward and illegible. The organizations in network rest on honesty and uprightness: it is enough to see the example of the Moso people: the jealousy does not exist and remains a taboo which does not pose problem. The values of love and peaces which melt their culture are practiced each day. There is not only with the museum of the primitive arts in Paris which we can discuss of these examples!
the center party militates for a parliamentary system, a new constitution and it makes the bet that in France, as in Germany, we can establish a coalition of the two great parties to answer the major challenges posed by the changes of our political environment, economic, social and maintaining also ecological. In this constitution, it intends to register the prohibition of the budgets in deficit: the state which must ensure a durable development the future generations cannot make weigh on them the debts of the present generation, it is necessary that the present generation is limited to its resources and does not live with the costs of his/her children.
The party ecologist
this movement hesitates, in our opinion between two bets: that to remain out of the field of the political parties since the field of ecology is common to any political action. It positions then like a movement referent able to give its expertise to the political, economic and social decision makers. The other possibility is to become a political party like the others, which it is actually obliged to become since in France, a movement obtains a space of word citizen only at the time of the elections, mainly of the presidential elections. Its actions touch with the modification of the ways of life on the ground and these successes make it credible. To develop its movement, in our opinion, it must use the way of the organization in network and in particular conclude the Confederation of the various local movements which are activated through the country. To amalgamate this movements in an organization in system of capacity able to ensure a direction the obedience of the various local groups is against the values of this movement. For us the choice is clear and the quarrels partisanes to make function a system of being able ecologist within a party single ecologist do not interest us! It does not remain about it less than the remarks of certain leaders ecologists are exactly the same ones as ours: “less goods and more bonds”, Being rather than To have (we say in poetry: “to live rather than to be” or “to only be”, to mark the difference between a human being born with the life and a human being which reappears with the life after its meeting with the mysteries of the life, it is not only one detail), to place the human being in the middle of the organization…
we do not have bets. We know where we go, from which the values and the standards come, ways of life of the culture in network which we seek to position back. We know our adversaries which always militate for the reinforcement of our systems of civil capacities, military and religious and which wants always more extremely to control the people with the liberal ultra dominant ideology or the dogmatic and fanaticized religious ideology which was established like the combatant of the liberal ultra ideology. We do not have to suffer from these electoral combat here and to undergo these warlike combat which devastate other areas.
If we must pose a bet, to propose a bet with the French political parties engaged in this election campaign 2007, it would be this one:
after the engagement of the candidates on the durable development and the fight against the reheating of planet, engagement which follows upon the will of a personality of ecology
after the example of the Pierre abbot and his creation of an organization in network to fight against the misery and the absence of a right to housing, and other examples of networks of mutual aid, companions
we ask the candidates to engage on the development of the local participative democracy and on the use of the principle of subsidiarity, principle to register in a new constitution in a new republic, inevitably 6th of the name. This engagement allows:
to surmount not with the referendum on the European constitution and to eliminate contradiction that there is in this project of European constitution between its orientation in favor it system of the economic capacity liberal and the presence from this principle of subsidiarity which is used as a basis for the development of an organization in network.
To answer a majority of citizens who want to sanction the political parties which took part in the capacity and to mitigate the effects of the votes sanction or the abstentions to make poll of 2007 a return to a life worthy and constructive citizen
To engage the change, the revolution, change of paradigm, values so that we leave our civil systems of capacity, economic, military, religious in order to set up organizations citizens in networks of life able to ensure the durable development of planet.
To supplement engagement on the durable development while engaging on the culture able to guarantee it.
If all this appears mysterious and incomprehensible, the Net surfer has at his disposal the Web site of fileane.com. He can read the example of a development of an organization in network through the novel “D' Éleusis with Dendérah, the prohibited evolution”. Even if this novel goes back ten years, like practically nothing to evolve/move in the direction of the novel, there remains always current. Ah if! a point has just been carried out! this point relates to the electronic war that the knights carry out against the NSA which is with the service of the leaders of Anglo-Saxon financial oligarchy: for a few days, we have known that the Chinese army is able to destroy a spy satellite passing to the top of China such as for example a satellite of the Echelon network. Like what, in our novel, there are little Utopia and intellectual imagination but rather a burning desire of living according to our reasons of living and not according to the orders of a system of being able which leads planet to the disaster. The choice of living does not support any bet.
the principle of subsidiarity
The great law which binds confederation of the people iroquois
SEXUAL LIFE OF THE SAVAGES
english translations library